[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/7] arch: __get_wchan || STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 03:45:59PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > stack_trace_save_tsk() *shouldn't* skip anything unless we've explicitly
> > told it to via skipnr, because I'd expect that
> It's what most archs happen to do today and is what
> stack_trace_save_tsk() as implemented using arch_stack_walk() does.
> Which is I think the closest to canonical we have.

It *is* confusing though. Even if 'nosched' may be the normally
desired behavior, stack_trace_save_tsk() should probably be named


 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-08 18:19    [W:0.094 / U:24.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site