lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 3/3] clk: lan966x: Add lan966x SoC clock driver
From
Date
On 30/09/2021 at 15:28, Kavyasree Kotagiri wrote:
> This adds Generic Clock Controller driver for lan966x SoC.
>
> Lan966x clock controller contains 3 PLLs - cpu_clk, ddr_clk
> and sys_clk. It generates and supplies clock to various
> peripherals within SoC.
> Register settings required to provide GCK clocking to a
> peripheral is as below:
> GCK_SRC_SEL = Select clock source.
> GCK_PRESCALER = Set divider value.
> GCK_ENA = 1 - Enable GCK clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kavyasree Kotagiri <kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com>
> Co-developed-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210930132815.15353-4-kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com
> ---
> v6 -> v7:
> - Added Kconfig and Makefile entires for lan966x clock driver.
>
> v5 -> v6:
> - No changes.
>
> v4 -> v5:
> - Returning proper error - PTR_ERR.
> - Removed unused variable "ret" in probe function.
>
> v3 -> v4:
> - Used clk_parent_data instead of of_clk_get_parent_name().
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - No changes.
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - No changes.
>
> drivers/clk/Kconfig | 7 ++
> drivers/clk/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/clk/clk-lan966x.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 244 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/clk-lan966x.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> index c5b3dc97396a..1b992a554ff8 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> @@ -221,6 +221,13 @@ config COMMON_CLK_GEMINI
> This driver supports the SoC clocks on the Cortina Systems Gemini
> platform, also known as SL3516 or CS3516.
>
> +config COMMON_CLK_LAN966X
> + bool "Generic Clock Controller driver for LAN966X SoC"
> + help
> + This driver provides support for Generic Clock Controller(GCK) on
> + LAN966X SoC. GCK generates and supplies clock to various peripherals
> + within the SoC.
> +
> config COMMON_CLK_ASPEED
> bool "Clock driver for Aspeed BMC SoCs"
> depends on ARCH_ASPEED || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Makefile b/drivers/clk/Makefile
> index e42312121e51..d8565ef01b34 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/Makefile
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_HIGHBANK) += clk-highbank.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_HSDK) += clk-hsdk-pll.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_K210) += clk-k210.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LMK04832) += clk-lmk04832.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_LAN966X) += clk-lan966x.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_LOCHNAGAR) += clk-lochnagar.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MAX77686) += clk-max77686.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MAX9485) += clk-max9485.o
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-lan966x.c b/drivers/clk/clk-lan966x.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0f24b95fd78f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-lan966x.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,236 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Microchip LAN966x SoC Clock driver.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Microchip Technology, Inc. and its subsidiaries
> + *
> + * Author: Kavyasree Kotagiri <kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/microchip,lan966x.h>
> +
> +#define GCK_ENA BIT(0)
> +#define GCK_SRC_SEL GENMASK(9, 8)
> +#define GCK_PRESCALER GENMASK(23, 16)
> +
> +static const char *clk_names[N_CLOCKS] = {

What about using a dynamic table and then, in the code, use ARRAY_SIZE()
macro in your loops? It might be more future proof if you add more
peripherals or adapt this driver to another SoC.

As far as I see, your N_CLOCKS define can go away then.

> + "qspi0", "qspi1", "qspi2", "sdmmc0",
> + "pi", "mcan0", "mcan1", "flexcom0",
> + "flexcom1", "flexcom2", "flexcom3",
> + "flexcom4", "timer", "usb_refclk",
> +};
> +
> +struct lan966x_gck {
> + struct clk_hw hw;
> + void __iomem *reg;
> +};
> +#define to_lan966x_gck(hw) container_of(hw, struct lan966x_gck, hw)
> +
> +static const struct clk_parent_data lan966x_gck_pdata[] = {
> + { .fw_name = "cpu_clk", .name = "cpu_clk" },
> + { .fw_name = "ddr_clk", .name = "ddr_clk" },
> + { .fw_name = "sys_clk", .name = "sys_clk" },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_init_data init = {
> + .parent_data = lan966x_gck_pdata,
> + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(lan966x_gck_pdata),
> +};
> +
> +static void __iomem *base;
> +
> +static int lan966x_gck_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct lan966x_gck *gck = to_lan966x_gck(hw);
> + u32 val = readl(gck->reg);
> +
> + val |= GCK_ENA;
> + writel(val, gck->reg);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void lan966x_gck_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct lan966x_gck *gck = to_lan966x_gck(hw);
> + u32 val = readl(gck->reg);
> +
> + val &= ~GCK_ENA;
> + writel(val, gck->reg);
> +}
> +
> +static int lan966x_gck_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct lan966x_gck *gck = to_lan966x_gck(hw);
> + u32 div, val = readl(gck->reg);
> +
> + if (rate == 0 || parent_rate == 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Set Prescalar */
> + div = parent_rate / rate;
> + val &= ~GCK_PRESCALER;
> + val |= FIELD_PREP(GCK_PRESCALER, (div - 1));
> + writel(val, gck->reg);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static long lan966x_gck_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long *parent_rate)
> +{
> + unsigned int div;
> +
> + if (rate == 0 || *parent_rate == 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (rate >= *parent_rate)
> + return *parent_rate;
> +
> + div = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(*parent_rate, rate);
> +
> + return *parent_rate / div;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long lan966x_gck_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct lan966x_gck *gck = to_lan966x_gck(hw);
> + u32 div, val = readl(gck->reg);
> +
> + div = FIELD_GET(GCK_PRESCALER, val);
> +
> + return parent_rate / (div + 1);
> +}
> +
> +static int lan966x_gck_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + struct clk_rate_request *req)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *parent;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw); ++i) {
> + parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(hw, i);
> + if (!parent)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (clk_hw_get_rate(parent) / req->rate < 254) {

I would use a well defined constant instead of this 254 number.

> + req->best_parent_hw = parent;
> + req->best_parent_rate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent);
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static u8 lan966x_gck_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct lan966x_gck *gck = to_lan966x_gck(hw);
> + u32 val = readl(gck->reg);
> +
> + return FIELD_GET(GCK_SRC_SEL, val);
> +}
> +
> +static int lan966x_gck_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> +{
> + struct lan966x_gck *gck = to_lan966x_gck(hw);
> + u32 val = readl(gck->reg);
> +
> + val &= ~GCK_SRC_SEL;
> + val |= FIELD_PREP(GCK_SRC_SEL, index);
> + writel(val, gck->reg);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops lan966x_gck_ops = {
> + .enable = lan966x_gck_enable,
> + .disable = lan966x_gck_disable,
> + .set_rate = lan966x_gck_set_rate,
> + .round_rate = lan966x_gck_round_rate,
> + .recalc_rate = lan966x_gck_recalc_rate,
> + .determine_rate = lan966x_gck_determine_rate,
> + .set_parent = lan966x_gck_set_parent,
> + .get_parent = lan966x_gck_get_parent,
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_hw *lan966x_gck_clk_register(struct device *dev, int i)
> +{
> + struct lan966x_gck *priv;
> + int ret;
> +
> + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + priv->reg = base + (i * 4);
> + priv->hw.init = &init;
> + ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &priv->hw);
> + if (ret)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> + return &priv->hw;
> +};
> +
> +static int lan966x_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw_onecell_data *hw_data;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + int i;
> +
> + hw_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*hw_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!hw_data)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(base))
> + return PTR_ERR(base);
> +
> + init.ops = &lan966x_gck_ops;
> +
> + hw_data->num = N_CLOCKS;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < N_CLOCKS; i++) {
> + init.name = clk_names[i];
> + hw_data->hws[i] = lan966x_gck_clk_register(dev, i);
> + if (IS_ERR(hw_data->hws[i])) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register %s clock\n",
> + init.name);
> + return PTR_ERR(hw_data->hws[i]);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, hw_data);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id lan966x_clk_dt_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "microchip,lan966x-gck", },
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, lan966x_clk_dt_ids);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver lan966x_clk_driver = {
> + .probe = lan966x_clk_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "lan966x-clk",
> + .of_match_table = lan966x_clk_dt_ids,
> + },
> +};
> +builtin_platform_driver(lan966x_clk_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Kavyasree Kotagiri <kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("LAN966X clock driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

The little remarks don't hold the driver approval, so you have my:

Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>

Best regards,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas Ferre

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-07 16:14    [W:0.068 / U:0.444 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site