lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/2] iommu/vt-d: avoid duplicated removing in __domain_mapping
From
Date
On 10/8/21 8:04 AM, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
> __domain_mapping() always removes the pages in the range from
> 'iov_pfn' to 'end_pfn', but the 'end_pfn' is always the last pfn
> of the range that the caller wants to map.
>
> This would introduce too many duplicated removing and leads the
> map operation take too long, for example:
>
> Map iova=0x100000,nr_pages=0x7d61800
> iov_pfn: 0x100000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
> iov_pfn: 0x140000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
> iov_pfn: 0x180000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
> iov_pfn: 0x1c0000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
> iov_pfn: 0x200000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
> ...
> it takes about 50ms in total.
>
> We can reduce the cost by recalculate the 'end_pfn' and limit it
> to the boundary of the end of this pte page.
>
> Map iova=0x100000,nr_pages=0x7d61800
> iov_pfn: 0x100000, end_pfn: 0x13ffff
> iov_pfn: 0x140000, end_pfn: 0x17ffff
> iov_pfn: 0x180000, end_pfn: 0x1bffff
> iov_pfn: 0x1c0000, end_pfn: 0x1fffff
> iov_pfn: 0x200000, end_pfn: 0x23ffff
> ...
> it only need 9ms now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 11 ++++++-----
> include/linux/intel-iommu.h | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index d75f59a..46edae6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -2354,12 +2354,17 @@ static void switch_to_super_page(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> return -ENOMEM;
> first_pte = pte;
>
> + lvl_pages = lvl_to_nr_pages(largepage_lvl);
> +
> /* It is large page*/
> if (largepage_lvl > 1) {
> unsigned long end_pfn;
> + unsigned long pages_to_remove;
>
> pteval |= DMA_PTE_LARGE_PAGE;
> - end_pfn = ((iov_pfn + nr_pages) & level_mask(largepage_lvl)) - 1;
> + pages_to_remove = min_t(unsigned long, nr_pages,
> + nr_pte_to_next_page(pte) * lvl_pages);
> + end_pfn = iov_pfn + pages_to_remove - 1;
> switch_to_super_page(domain, iov_pfn, end_pfn, largepage_lvl);
> } else {
> pteval &= ~(uint64_t)DMA_PTE_LARGE_PAGE;
> @@ -2381,10 +2386,6 @@ static void switch_to_super_page(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> WARN_ON(1);
> }
>
> - lvl_pages = lvl_to_nr_pages(largepage_lvl);
> -
> - BUG_ON(nr_pages < lvl_pages);
> -
> nr_pages -= lvl_pages;
> iov_pfn += lvl_pages;
> phys_pfn += lvl_pages;
> diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> index 9bcabc7..b29b2a3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> @@ -713,6 +713,12 @@ static inline bool first_pte_in_page(struct dma_pte *pte)
> return IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)pte, VTD_PAGE_SIZE);
> }
>
> +static inline int nr_pte_to_next_page(struct dma_pte *pte)
> +{
> + return first_pte_in_page(pte) ? BIT_ULL(VTD_STRIDE_SHIFT) :
> + (struct dma_pte *)ALIGN((unsigned long)pte, VTD_PAGE_SIZE) - pte;

We should make it like this to avoid the 0day warning:

(struct dma_pte *)(uintptr_t)VTD_PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)pte) - pte;

Can you please test this line of change? No need to send a new version.
I will handle it if it passes your test.

> +}
> +
> extern struct dmar_drhd_unit * dmar_find_matched_drhd_unit(struct pci_dev *dev);
> extern int dmar_find_matched_atsr_unit(struct pci_dev *dev);
>
>

Best regards,
baolu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-08 04:12    [W:0.069 / U:0.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site