lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1] drm/msm: use compatible string to find mdp node
Quoting Krishna Manikandan (2021-10-05 02:44:31)
> In the current implementation, substring comparison
> using device node name is used to find mdp node
> during driver probe. Use compatible string instead
> of node name to get mdp node from the parent mdss node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Manikandan <mkrishn@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> index 2e6fc18..50a23cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> @@ -1241,9 +1241,16 @@ static int add_components_mdp(struct device *mdp_dev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int compare_name_mdp(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +static int find_mdp_node(struct device *dev, void *data)
> {
> - return (strstr(dev_name(dev), "mdp") != NULL);
> + return of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,mdp4") ||

Why do we care about mdp4? It looks like this function is only called if
get_mdp_ver() returns 5 or DPU, in which case 4 isn't relevant?

> + of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,mdp5") ||
> + of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,mdss_mdp") ||
> + of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,sdm845-dpu") ||
> + of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,sm8150-dpu") ||
> + of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,sm8250-dpu") ||
> + of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,sc7180-dpu") ||
> + of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,sc7280-dpu");

Instead of this duplicate string check why not use canonical compatible
lists?

return of_match_node(dpu_dt_match, dev->of_node) ||
of_match_node(mdp5_dt_match, dev->of_node);


This way we're not constantly updating this list of compatibles in two
places.

> }
>
> static int add_display_components(struct platform_device *pdev,
> @@ -1268,7 +1275,7 @@ static int add_display_components(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - mdp_dev = device_find_child(dev, NULL, compare_name_mdp);
> + mdp_dev = device_find_child(dev, NULL, find_mdp_node);
> if (!mdp_dev) {
> DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to find MDSS MDP node\n");
> of_platform_depopulate(dev);

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-05 20:07    [W:0.047 / U:1.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site