Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:44:18 +0300 | From | Jarkko Sakkinen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] crypto: use SM3 instead of SM3_256 |
| |
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 03:56:25PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote: > According to https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-01.html, > SM3 always produces a 256-bit hash value and there are no plans for > other length development, so there is no ambiguity in the name of sm3. > > Suggested-by: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
The commit message does not contain a description of what kind of code change you're doing.
/Jarkko
| |