lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Inode 2885482 (000000008e814f64): i_reserved_data_blocks (2) not cleared!
From
Date


On 10/15/21 5:57 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 02:06:52AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:54:14PM +0000, Rantala, Tommi T. (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm seeing these i_reserved_data_blocks not cleared! messages when using ext4
>>> with nodelalloc, message added in:
>>>
>>> commit 6fed83957f21eff11c8496e9f24253b03d2bc1dc
>>> Author: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
>>> Date: Mon Aug 23 14:13:58 2021 +0800
>>>
>>> ext4: fix reserved space counter leakage
>>>
>>> I can quickly reproduce in 5.15.0-rc5-00041-g348949d9a444 by doing some
>>> filesystem I/O while toggling delalloc:
>>>
>>>
>>> while true; do mount -o remount,nodelalloc /; sleep 1; mount -o remount,delalloc /; sleep 1; done &
>>> git clone linux xxx; rm -rf xxx
>>
>> If I understand correctly, switching such option implies
>> sync inodes to write back exist delayed allocation blocks.
>
> Well, no. What it implies is that all writes after the remount into
> an unallocated portion of the file will be allocated at the time when
> the page is dirtied, instead of when the page is written back. It's
> possible for some pages to be written using delayed allocation, and
> some other pages in the legacy "allocate on page dirty" mechanism.
> This can happen when the file system is remounted; it can also happen
> when the file system starts getting close to 100% full. See the
> comment in ext4_nonda_switch:
>
> /*
> * switch to non delalloc mode if we are running low
> * on free block. The free block accounting via percpu
> * counters can get slightly wrong with percpu_counter_batch getting
> * accumulated on each CPU without updating global counters
> * Delalloc need an accurate free block accounting. So switch
> * to non delalloc when we are near to error range.
> */
>

So it seems possible that s_dirtyclusters_counter/i_reserved_data_blocks
counters are not maintained anymore when filesystem gets remounted from
'delalloc' to 'nodelalloc', even when you're writing back a (previously)
delay allocated page cache (when it's still mounted as 'delalloc'). Thus
it is possible that s_dirtyclusters_counter/i_reserved_data_blocks
counters are non-zero when the inode is finally evicted and destroyed.

IMHO I think this inconsistency is problematic. For example, when
filesystem gets remounted from 'delalloc' to 'nodelalloc' and then runs
for a period, s_dirtyclusters_counter/i_reserved_data_blocks counters
already gets inconsistent. Then it's remounted back to 'delalloc', in
which case s_dirtyclusters_counter/i_reserved_data_blocks counters are
already incorrect.



--
Thanks,
Jeffle

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-18 05:54    [W:0.070 / U:1.884 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site