lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] media: rkvdec: Align decoder behavior with Hantro and Cedrus
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 9:40 PM Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@ndufresne.ca> wrote:
>
> Le mercredi 13 octobre 2021 à 15:05 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 11:42 PM Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@ndufresne.ca> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Chen-Yu,
> > >
> > > thanks for looking into this.
> > >
> > > Le vendredi 08 octobre 2021 à 18:04 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai a écrit :
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > While working on the rkvdec H.264 decoder for ChromeOS, I noticed some
> > > > behavioral differences compared to Hantro and Cedrus:
> > > >
> > > > 1. The driver always overrides the sizeimage setting given by userspace
> > > > for the output format. This results in insufficient buffer space when
> > > > running the ChromeOS video_decode_accelerator_tests test program,
> > > > likely due to a small initial resolution followed by dynamic
> > > > resolution change.
> > > >
> > > > 2. Doesn't support dynamic resolution change.
> > > >
> > > > This small series fixes both and aligns the behavior with the other two
> > > > stateless decoder drivers. This was tested on the downstream ChromeOS
> > > > 5.10 kernel with ChromeOS. Also compiled tested on mainline but I don't
> > > > have any other RK3399 devices set up to test video stuff, so testing
> > > > would be very much appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Also, I'm not sure if user applications are required to check the value
> > > > of sizeimage upon S_FMT return. If the value is different or too small,
> > > > what can the application do besides fail? AFAICT it can't split the
> > > > data of one frame (or slice) between different buffers.
> > >
> > > While most software out there just assumes that driver will do it right and
> > > crash when it's not the case, application that do map the buffer to CPU must
> > > read back the fmt structure as the drivers are all fail-safe and will modify
> > > that structure to a set of valid value s for the context.
> >
> > I believe what is happening in Chromium is that the decoder is opened with
> > some default settings, including the smallest viable resolution for the
> > output side, and the buffers allocated accordingly. When dynamic resolution
> > change happens, the decoder does not check if the current buffers are
> > sufficiently sized; it just assumes that they are. And when it starts
> > pushing data into the buffers, it realizes they are too small and fails.
> >
> > The spec also says:
> >
> > Clients are allowed to set the sizeimage field for variable length
> > compressed data flagged with V4L2_FMT_FLAG_COMPRESSED at ioctl
> > VIDIOC_ENUM_FMT, but the driver may ignore it and set the value itself,
> > or it may modify the provided value based on alignment requirements or
> > minimum/maximum size requirements.
> >
> > The spec only guarantees that the buffers are of sufficient size for the
> > resolution configured at the time they were allocated/requested.
> >
> > So I think my first patch is a workaround for a somewhat broken userspace.
> > But it seems the other stateless drivers are providing similar behavior,
> > as I previously mentioned.
>
> That's what I mean, this is not a driver bug strictly speaking (assuming it does
> guaranty the buffer size is sufficient) but it is without your change
> inconvenient, as userspace may be aware of the largest resolution it will
> decode, and may want to allocate larger buffer upfront.

Thinking about this more, I think a few follow up fixes for each driver
are in order. The spec implies that the driver should override the value
should userspace give some unrealistic value, such as asking for a 256 byte
buffer for a 4K frame size.

Cedrus (CCing Jernej) comes close, but a 1K buffer might not be enough for
really large frames, even though it's slice based?

ChenYu


> As per Chromium bug, this is being addressed already. Thanks for this driver
> improvement.
>
> >
> > > As for opposite direction (output vs capture) format being changed, this should
> > > be documented in the spec, if you find it too unclear or missing for sateless
> > > codec (I know it's there for stateful but can't remember, would have to re-read,
> > > for stateless) let us know.
> >
> > AFAICT the capture side is working OK and to spec.
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > ChenYu
> >
> > > regards,
> > > Nicolas
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Andrzej, I believe the second patch would conflict with your VP9 series.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > ChenYu
> > > >
> > > > Chen-Yu Tsai (2):
> > > > media: rkvdec: Do not override sizeimage for output format
> > > > media: rkvdec: Support dynamic resolution changes
> > > >
> > > > drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-h264.c | 5 +--
> > > > drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c | 40 +++++++++++-----------
> > > > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-14 09:31    [W:0.083 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site