Messages in this thread | | | From | Paul Moore <> | Date | Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:12:38 -0400 | Subject | Re: [PATCH -next,v2 1/2] audit: fix possible null-pointer dereference in audit_filter_rules |
| |
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 5:10 AM Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com> wrote: > > Fix this possible null-pointer dereference in audit_filter_rules.
Thanks for fixing this, just a couple of small comments:
I think you can drop the description text below here, the code snippet is just a duplicate of the code and the error message is pretty obvious.
> If ctx is null, a null-pointer dereference will occur: > case AUDIT_SADDR_FAM: > if (ctx->sockaddr) > ... > break; > > audit_filter_rules() error: we previously assumed 'ctx' could be null > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > Signed-off-by: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
I would also add a Fixes tag, for example:
Fixes: bf361231c295 ("audit: add saddr_fam filter field")
> --- > kernel/auditsc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c > index 4ba3b8573ff4..42d4a4320526 100644 > --- a/kernel/auditsc.c > +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c > @@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, > result = audit_comparator(audit_loginuid_set(tsk), f->op, f->val); > break; > case AUDIT_SADDR_FAM: > - if (ctx->sockaddr) > + if (ctx && ctx->sockaddr) > result = audit_comparator(ctx->sockaddr->ss_family, > f->op, f->val); > break; > -- > 2.30.0
-- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
| |