Messages in this thread | | | From | Saravana Kannan <> | Date | Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:52:12 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: Kconfig: Update ARCH_EXYNOS select configs |
| |
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:02 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 09:10:31PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > Generally, the subsystems being mentioned here are so basic (clock, > > pinctrl, rtc), that I really can't imagine what kind of rocket science > > one might want to hide for competitive reasons... If it's for an > > entire SoC, I wonder why Intel and AMD don't have similar concerns and > > contribute support for their newest hardware far before the release. > > There is no reason at all, and to be honest this whole discussion with > these bullshit arguments from the Google/Linaro/SoC vendor crowd just > shows how on crack these people are, and shows a good example of why > we should not support these models at all. There is no good reason > to "overide" uptream functionality EVER. Stop digging yourselves into > your ever bigger holes and just f***king contribute upstream NOW. Just > as we always have we should not give you more rope to shoot yoursel > while ausing us extra overhead.
Maybe you need to read up the code of conduct again.
-Saravana
| |