lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: Kconfig: Update ARCH_EXYNOS select configs
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:02 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 09:10:31PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Generally, the subsystems being mentioned here are so basic (clock,
> > pinctrl, rtc), that I really can't imagine what kind of rocket science
> > one might want to hide for competitive reasons... If it's for an
> > entire SoC, I wonder why Intel and AMD don't have similar concerns and
> > contribute support for their newest hardware far before the release.
>
> There is no reason at all, and to be honest this whole discussion with
> these bullshit arguments from the Google/Linaro/SoC vendor crowd just
> shows how on crack these people are, and shows a good example of why
> we should not support these models at all. There is no good reason
> to "overide" uptream functionality EVER. Stop digging yourselves into
> your ever bigger holes and just f***king contribute upstream NOW. Just
> as we always have we should not give you more rope to shoot yoursel
> while ausing us extra overhead.

Maybe you need to read up the code of conduct again.

-Saravana

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-01 06:53    [W:0.143 / U:0.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site