Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:38:18 +0200 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/6] dyndbg updates for 5.15-rcX |
| |
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 03:33:44PM -0600, jim.cromie@gmail.com wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:06 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:37:29PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote: > > > Hi Jason, Greg, > > > > > > Heres a set of "maintenance" patches distilled out of other work. Its > > > almost all tweaks to verbose output, except for 1st, which changes a > > > strcmp to == because its true, and useful going forward. > > > > > > Jim Cromie (6): > > > dyndbg: recode for stronger precondition > > > dyndbg: show module in vpr-info in dd-exec-queries > > > dyndbg: rationalize verbosity > > > dyndbg: use alt-quotes in vpr-infos, not those user might use > > > dyndbg: vpr-info on remove-module complete, not starting > > > dyndbg: no vpr-info on empty queries > > > > > > .../admin-guide/dynamic-debug-howto.rst | 2 +- > > > lib/dynamic_debug.c | 47 ++++++++++--------- > > > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > > > Are these real bug fixes that have to get into 5.15-final? They seem > > like 5.16-rc1 patches instead. > > > > not real bug fixes. > I thought maybe theyre low-risk enough, maybe on rc1+, but I was late.
Then please do not force me to be the one to push back, you know the development model...
> I'll try to hit the window right for 5.16
So do you want me to pick these up now for my -next branch to get proper testing in time for 5.16-rc1?
thanks,
greg k-h
| |