Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] software_node: Add kernel-doc comments to exported symbols | From | Daniel Scally <> | Date | Thu, 7 Jan 2021 14:45:33 +0000 |
| |
Hi Heikki
On 07/01/2021 14:19, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 03:39:42PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: >> Hi Andy >> >> On 05/01/2021 14:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 11:47:36PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: >>>> A number of functions which are exported via EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() lack any >>>> kernel-doc comments; add those in so all exported symbols are documented. >>> Thanks, it's helpful! >>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> >>> after addressing few nitpicks >> Thanks for reviewing >>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> >>>> --- >>>> With a view to maybe writing some documentation once the fwnode_graph_*() >>>> functions are also added. >>> FWIW, Heikki used to have a draft patch of swnode documentation, not sure >>> what's the current status of it. >> Oh cool ok; I'll defer to him then. > I actually had a similar patch prepared as part of the series adding > the documentation for software nodes, but your comments are better > than mine. So, after you have addressed Andy's comments: > > Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Great, thanks - and for the other R-bs just now also. I'll send a v2 of this one tonight/tomorrow (depends how much else I get through)
| |