lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v14 08/13] KVM: VMX: Add a synthetic MSR to allow userspace VMM to access GUEST_SSP
From
Date
On 06/11/20 02:16, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> Introduce a host-only synthetic MSR, MSR_KVM_GUEST_SSP so that the VMM
> can read/write the guest's SSP, e.g. to migrate CET state. Use a
> synthetic MSR, e.g. as opposed to a VCPU_REG_, as GUEST_SSP is subject
> to the same consistency checks as the PL*_SSP MSRs, i.e. can share code.
>
> Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
> index 812e9b4c1114..5203dc084125 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> #define MSR_KVM_POLL_CONTROL 0x4b564d05
> #define MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_INT 0x4b564d06
> #define MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_ACK 0x4b564d07
> +#define MSR_KVM_GUEST_SSP 0x4b564d08
>
> struct kvm_steal_time {
> __u64 steal;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index dd78d3a79e79..28ba8414a7a3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -1817,7 +1817,8 @@ static bool cet_is_ssp_msr_accessible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> if (msr->host_initiated)
> return true;
>
> - if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK))
> + if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) ||
> + msr->index == MSR_KVM_GUEST_SSP)
> return false;
>
> if (msr->index == MSR_IA32_INT_SSP_TAB)
> @@ -1995,6 +1996,11 @@ static int vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> return 1;
> msr_info->data = vmcs_readl(GUEST_INTR_SSP_TABLE);
> break;
> + case MSR_KVM_GUEST_SSP:
> + if (!cet_is_ssp_msr_accessible(vcpu, msr_info))
> + return 1;
> + msr_info->data = vmcs_readl(GUEST_SSP);
> + break;
> case MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP ... MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP:
> if (!cet_is_ssp_msr_accessible(vcpu, msr_info))
> return 1;
> @@ -2287,12 +2293,16 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> return 1;
> vmcs_writel(GUEST_INTR_SSP_TABLE, data);
> break;
> + case MSR_KVM_GUEST_SSP:
> case MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP ... MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP:
> if (!cet_is_ssp_msr_accessible(vcpu, msr_info))
> return 1;
> if ((data & GENMASK(2, 0)) || is_noncanonical_address(data, vcpu))
> return 1;
> - vmx_set_xsave_msr(msr_info);
> + if (msr_index == MSR_KVM_GUEST_SSP)
> + vmcs_writel(GUEST_SSP, data);
> + else
> + vmx_set_xsave_msr(msr_info);
> break;
> case MSR_TSC_AUX:
> if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
>

Doh, I misread the change in cet_is_ssp_msr_accessible, sorry. */

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-28 18:45    [W:0.222 / U:0.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site