lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] tpm_tis: Add missing start/stop_tpm_chip calls
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 08:46:48AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-01-26 at 16:46 +0100, Łukasz Majczak wrote:
> > Hi Jarkko, Guenter
> >
> > Yes, here are the logs when failure occurs -
> > https://gist.github.com/semihalf-majczak-lukasz/1575461f585f1e7fb1e9366b8eceaab9
> > Look for a phrase "TPM returned invalid status"
>
> We've had other reports of this:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/ghsgagsnag.fsf@gouders.net/
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/374e918c-f167-9308-2bea-ae6bc6a3d2e3@elloe.vision/
>
> The problem is some TIS TPMs don't begin in the correct locality so we
> have to set it. When I proposed the check, I also proposed a fix for
> this problem:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20201001180925.13808-5-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com/
>
> But it's part of a series that never went upstream. Part of the reason
> was Jarkko proposed the get/put patch to fix this instead, but that
> never went upstream either. We need to decide an approach and apply
> one or other fixes.

Can you remind me what I proposed? I remember only proposing removing
interrupt code.

Can you pick up just 1/5 and 2/5 from that serieis and send them as a
mini series?

I had one remark for 1/5, which can be found here:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20201024120744.GA32607@kernel.org/

I don't think there was never argument on locality changes.

/Jarkko

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-28 07:01    [W:1.105 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site