lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] memory: tegra: Remove calls to dev_pm_opp_set_clkname()
On 27-01-21, 22:27, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 27.01.2021 13:16, Viresh Kumar пишет:
> > There is no point calling dev_pm_opp_set_clkname() with the "name"
> > parameter set to NULL, this is already done by the OPP core at setup
> > time and should work as it is.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> >
> > ---
> > V2: Update tegra124 as well.
> >
> > Krzysztof, please take this through your tree, it doesn't have any
> > dependency in the OPP tree.
> > ---
> > drivers/memory/tegra/tegra124-emc.c | 13 ++-----------
> > drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c | 13 ++-----------
> > drivers/memory/tegra/tegra30-emc.c | 13 ++-----------
> > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> Ideally drivers should be able to ensure that OPP table received the
> clk, IMO.

I don't really agree with that, this stuff is internal to the OPP
core. And it should all work unless there is a bug, whose effects we
will see anyway.

> But this is also almost fine with me since realistically
> clk_get() shouldn't fail if it already succeeded a moment ago.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>

Thanks.

Krzysztof, please apply the patch to your tree. Thanks.

> Could we please fix the _allocate_opp_table() to not ignore clk_get()
> errors like -ENOMEM and etc?

Maybe we should fail if the error is anything other than -ENODEV ?

--
viresh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-28 05:21    [W:0.065 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site