lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/6] mfd: iqs62x: Do not poll during ATI
Hi Lee,

Thank you for taking a look at the series.

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:17:11AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jan 2021, Jeff LaBundy wrote:
>
> > After loading firmware, the driver triggers ATI (calibration) with
> > the newly loaded register configuration in place. Next, the driver
> > polls a register field to ensure ATI completed in a timely fashion
> > and that the device is ready to sense.
> >
> > However, communicating with the device over I2C while ATI is under-
>
> This doesn't line-up with all of the others! ;)

:)

>
> > way may induce noise in the device and cause ATI to fail. As such,
> > the vendor recommends not to poll the device during ATI.
> >
> > To solve this problem, let the device naturally signal to the host
> > that ATI is complete by way of an interrupt. A completion prevents
> > the sub-devices from being registered until this happens.
> >
> > The former logic that scaled ATI timeout and filter settling delay
> > is not carried forward with the new implementation, as it produces
> > overly conservative delays at lower clock rates. Instead, a single
> > pair of delays that covers all cases is used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/iqs62x.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > include/linux/mfd/iqs62x.h | 6 ++-
> > 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -567,6 +600,12 @@ static void iqs62x_firmware_load(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
> > goto err_out;
> > }
> >
> > + if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&iqs62x->ati_done,
> > + msecs_to_jiffies(2000))) {
> > + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to complete ATI\n");
> > + goto err_out;
> > + }
> > +
> > ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&client->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> > iqs62x->dev_desc->sub_devs,
> > iqs62x->dev_desc->num_sub_devs,
> > @@ -763,7 +802,6 @@ static const struct iqs62x_dev_desc iqs62x_devs[] = {
> > .prox_settings = IQS620_PROX_SETTINGS_4,
> > .hall_flags = IQS620_HALL_FLAGS,
> >
> > - .clk_div = 4,
>
> No unnecessary double-line spacings please.

Not a problem, v2 on the way. There are a couple nearby instances of
double-spacing within these same structs so I'll nuke those as well.

[...]

Kind regards,
Jeff LaBundy

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-15 05:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog