lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH v3 0/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller
From
Date
On 1/5/21 1:22 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 12/23/20 4:05 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/16/2020 1:41 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>>> v3 -- discard commit from v2; instead rely on the new function
>>> reset_control_rearm provided in a recent commit [1] applied
>>> to reset/next.
>>> -- New commit to correct pcie-brcmstb.c usage of a reset controller
>>> to use reset/rearm verses deassert/assert.
>>>
>>> v2 -- refactor rescal-reset driver to implement assert/deassert rather than
>>> reset because the reset call only fires once per lifetime and we need
>>> to reset after every resume from S2 or S3.
>>> -- Split the use of "ahci" and "rescal" controllers in separate fields
>>> to keep things simple.
>>>
>>> v1 -- original
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] Applied commit "reset: make shared pulsed reset controls re-triggerable"
>>> found at git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git
>>> branch reset/shared-retrigger
>>
>> The changes in that branch above have now landed in Linus' tree with:
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=557acb3d2cd9c82de19f944f6cc967a347735385
>>
>> It would be good if we could get both patches applied via the same tree
>> or within the same cycle to avoid having either PCIe or SATA broken on
>> these platforms.
>
> Ping? Can someone apply those patches if you are happy with them? Thank you.

Ping? Can we review and ideally also apply these patches? Thanks
--
Florian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-14 21:49    [W:0.072 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site