lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v12 12/13] mm/hugetlb: Gather discrete indexes of tail page
From
Date
On 1/6/21 6:19 AM, Muchun Song wrote:
> For HugeTLB page, there are more metadata to save in the struct page.
> But the head struct page cannot meet our needs, so we have to abuse
> other tail struct page to store the metadata. In order to avoid
> conflicts caused by subsequent use of more tail struct pages, we can
> gather these discrete indexes of tail struct page. In this case, it
> will be easier to add a new tail page index later.
>
> There are only (RESERVE_VMEMMAP_SIZE / sizeof(struct page)) struct
> page structs that can be used when CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP,
> so add a BUILD_BUG_ON to catch invalid usage of the tail struct page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> ---
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h | 15 +++++++++------
> mm/hugetlb.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
> mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c | 8 ++++++++
> 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

My apologies! I did not get to this patch in previous versions of the
series. My "RFC create hugetlb flags to consolidate state" was done
before I even noticed your efforts here.

At least we agree the metadata could be better organized. :)

IMO, using page.private of the head page to consolidate flags will be
easier to manage. So, I would like to use that.

The BUILD_BUG_ON in this patch makes sense.
--
Mike Kravetz

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-14 03:21    [W:0.210 / U:0.980 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site