lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1] i2c: tegra: Fix i2c_writesl() to use writel() instead of writesl()
From
Date

On 1/11/21 11:29 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 11.01.2021 20:38, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>> On 1/11/21 4:09 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> 11.01.2021 14:50, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>>>> 20.10.2020 19:37, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>> On 10/20/20 12:48 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 09:03:54PM -0700, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>>>>>> VI I2C don't have DMA support and uses PIO mode all the time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Current driver uses writesl() to fill TX FIFO based on available
>>>>>>> empty slots and with this seeing strange silent hang during any I2C
>>>>>>> register access after filling TX FIFO with 8 words.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Using writel() followed by i2c_readl() in a loop to write all words
>>>>>>> to TX FIFO instead of using writesl() helps for large transfers in
>>>>>>> PIO mode.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, this patch updates i2c_writesl() API to use writel() in a loop
>>>>>>> instead of writesl().
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>    drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 9 ++++++---
>>>>>>>    1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>>>>>>> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>>>>>>> index 6f08c0c..274bf3a 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>>>>>>> @@ -333,10 +333,13 @@ static u32 i2c_readl(struct tegra_i2c_dev
>>>>>>> *i2c_dev, unsigned int reg)
>>>>>>>        return readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base +
>>>>>>> tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev, reg));
>>>>>>>    }
>>>>>>>    -static void i2c_writesl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, void
>>>>>>> *data,
>>>>>>> +static void i2c_writesl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, u32 *data,
>>>>>>>                unsigned int reg, unsigned int len)
>>>>>>>    {
>>>>>>> -    writesl(i2c_dev->base + tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev, reg), data,
>>>>>>> len);
>>>>>>> +    while (len--) {
>>>>>>> +        writel(*data++, i2c_dev->base + tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev,
>>>>>>> reg));
>>>>>>> +        i2c_readl(i2c_dev, I2C_INT_STATUS);
>>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>>>    }
>>>>>>>      static void i2c_readsl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, void
>>>>>>> *data,
>>>>>>> @@ -811,7 +814,7 @@ static int tegra_i2c_fill_tx_fifo(struct
>>>>>>> tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>>>>>>>            i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining = buf_remaining;
>>>>>>>            i2c_dev->msg_buf = buf + words_to_transfer *
>>>>>>> BYTES_PER_FIFO_WORD;
>>>>>>>    -        i2c_writesl(i2c_dev, buf, I2C_TX_FIFO,
>>>>>>> words_to_transfer);
>>>>>>> +        i2c_writesl(i2c_dev, (u32 *)buf, I2C_TX_FIFO,
>>>>>>> words_to_transfer);
>>>>>> I've thought a bit more about this and I wonder if we're simply
>>>>>> reading
>>>>>> out the wrong value for tx_fifo_avail and therefore end up overflowing
>>>>>> the TX FIFO. Have you checked what the value is for tx_fifo_avail when
>>>>>> this silent hang occurs? Given that this is specific to the VI I2C I'm
>>>>>> wondering if this is perhaps a hardware bug where we read the wrong TX
>>>>>> FIFO available count.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thierry
>>>>> Yes FIFO status shows all 8 slots available.
>>>> Please explain how you checked that 8 slots are available, provide
>>>> example code.
>>>>
>>> Have you checked the FIFO overflow interrupt?
>> This is seen with VI I2C (which is under host1x) as we use PIO mode
>> always even for large transfers.
>> HW wise VI I2C is similar to other I2C and FIFO depth is also 8 words.
>>
>> tegra_i2c_fill_tx_fifo() reads I2C_FIFO_STATUS register field
>> TX_FIFO_EMPTY_CNT which tells empty slots available in TX_FIFO that can
>> be filled.
>> Added debug message to print empty count and, during beginning of
>> transfer when it executes tegra_i2c_fill_tx_fifo(), empty slots are 8
>>
>>
>> Using writesl() for filling TX_FIFO causing silent hang immediate on any
>> i2c register access after filling FIFO with 8 words and some times with
>> 6 words as well.
>>
>> So couldn't INTERRUPT_STATUS registers to check for TX FIFO Overflows
>> when this silent hang happens.
>>
>> Tried to read thru back-door (JTAG path) but could not connect to JTAG
>> either. Looks like Tegra chip is in some weird state.
>>
>> But using writel() followed by i2c_readl helps. Not sure if any thing
>> related to register access delay or some other issue.
>>
>>
> Does downstream kernel have this problem?
>
> If there is really no good alternative right now, then perhaps should be
> a bit cleaner to add i2c_writesl_vi(), which should contain explanatory
> comment telling why it's needed and then it should be used only for the
> VI I2C controller.

Yes downstream also has same issue when using writesl() and downstream
vi i2c driver uses writel() followed by i2c_readl()

OK. Will create separate i2c_writesl_vi() to use with vi i2c and will
add comment in the code.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-11 20:35    [W:0.088 / U:0.580 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site