lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: add non-BPF_LSM test for task local storage
From
Date


On 1/8/21 3:19 PM, Song Liu wrote:
> Task local storage is enabled for tracing programs. Add a test for it
> without CONFIG_BPF_LSM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> ---
> .../bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_storage.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_storage.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_storage.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_storage.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_storage.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_storage.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..7de7a154ebbe6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_storage.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook */

2020 -> 2021

> +
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include "task_local_storage.skel.h"
> +
> +static unsigned int duration;
> +
> +void test_test_task_local_storage(void)
> +{
> + struct task_local_storage *skel;
> + const int count = 10;
> + int i, err;
> +
> + skel = task_local_storage__open_and_load();
> +

Extra line is unnecessary here.

> + if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open_and_load", "skeleton open and load failed\n"))
> + return;
> +
> + err = task_local_storage__attach(skel);
> +

ditto.

> + if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attach failed\n"))
> + goto out;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> + usleep(1000);

Does a smaller usleep value will work? If it is, recommend to have a
smaller value here to reduce test_progs running time.

> + CHECK(skel->bss->value < count, "task_local_storage_value",
> + "task local value too small\n");
> +
> +out:
> + task_local_storage__destroy(skel);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_storage.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_storage.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..807255c5c162d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_storage.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook */

2020 -> 2021

> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> +
> +struct local_data {
> + __u64 val;
> +};
> +
> +struct {
> + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_TASK_STORAGE);
> + __uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
> + __type(key, int);
> + __type(value, struct local_data);
> +} task_storage_map SEC(".maps");
> +
> +int value = 0;
> +
> +SEC("tp_btf/sched_switch")
> +int BPF_PROG(on_switch, bool preempt, struct task_struct *prev,
> + struct task_struct *next)
> +{
> + struct local_data *storage;

If it possible that we do some filtering based on test_progs pid
so below bpf_task_storage_get is only called for test_progs process?
This is more targeted and can avoid counter contributions from
other unrelated processes and make test_task_local_storage.c result
comparison more meaningful.

> +
> + storage = bpf_task_storage_get(&task_storage_map,
> + next, 0,
> + BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE);
> + if (storage) {
> + storage->val++;
> + value = storage->val;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-11 18:33    [W:0.057 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site