lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Freedreno] [PATCH] drm/msm: Only enable A6xx LLCC code on A6xx
Hi Rob,

On 2021-01-08 22:16, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 6:05 AM Sai Prakash Ranjan
> <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 2021-01-08 19:09, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> >> Konrad, can you please test this below change without your change?
>> >
>> > This brings no difference, a BUG still happens. We're still calling
>> > to_a6xx_gpu on ANY device that's probed! Too bad it won't turn my A330
>> > into an A640..
>> >
>> > Also, relying on disabling LLCC in the config is out of question as it
>> > makes the arm32 kernel not compile with DRM/MSM and it just removes
>> > the functionality on devices with a6xx.. (unless somebody removes the
>> > dependency on it, which in my opinion is even worse and will cause
>> > more problems for developers!).
>> >
>>
>> Disabling LLCC is not the suggestion, I was under the impression that
>> was the cause here for the smmu bug. Anyways, the check for llc slice
>> in case llcc is disabled is not correct as well. I will send a patch
>> for
>> that as well.
>>
>> > The bigger question is how and why did that piece of code ever make it
>> > to adreno_gpu.c and not a6xx_gpu.c?
>> >
>>
>> My mistake, I will move it.
>
> Thanks, since we don't have kernel-CI coverage for gpu, and there
> probably isn't one person who has all the different devices supported
> (or enough hours in the day to test them all), it is probably
> better/safer to keep things in the backend code that is specific to a
> given generation.
>

Agreed, I will post this change soon and will introduce some feature
check as well because we will need it for iommu prot flag as per
discussion
here -
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210108181830.GA5457@willie-the-truck/

>> > To solve it in a cleaner way I propose to move it to an a6xx-specific
>> > file, or if it's going to be used with next-gen GPUs, perhaps manage
>> > calling of this code via an adreno quirk/feature in adreno_device.c.
>> > Now that I think about it, A5xx GPMU en/disable could probably managed
>> > like that, instead of using tons of if-statements for each GPU model
>> > that has it..
>> >
>> > While we're at it, do ALL (and I truly do mean ALL, including the
>> > low-end ones, this will be important later on) A6xx GPUs make use of
>> > that feature?
>> >
>>
>> I do not have a list of all A6XX GPUs with me currently, but from what
>> I know, A618, A630, A640, A650 has the support.
>>
>
> From the PoV of bringing up new a6xx, we should probably consider that
> some of them may not *yet* have LLCC enabled. I have an 8cx laptop
> and once I find time to get the display working, the next step would
> be bringing up a680.. and I'd probably like to start without LLCC..
>

Right, once I move the LLCC code to a6xx specific address space
creation,
without LLCC slices for GPU specified in qcom llcc driver, we will not
be using it.

Thanks,
Sai

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-01-11 05:26    [W:0.594 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site