Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/8] FPGA DFL Changes for 5.12 | From | Tom Rix <> | Date | Sun, 10 Jan 2021 07:46:29 -0800 |
| |
On 1/7/21 8:09 AM, Tom Rix wrote: > On 1/6/21 8:37 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote: >> This is a resend of the previous (unfortunately late) patchset of >> changes for FPGA DFL. > Is there something I can do to help ? > > I am paid to look after linux-fpga, so i have plenty of time. > > Some ideas of what i am doing now privately i can do publicly. > > 1. keep linux-fpga sync-ed to greg's branch so linux-fpga is normally in a pullable state. > > 2. an in-flight dev branch for the outstanding patches
I have setup these branches based on Greg's char-misc-next
fpga-next, which is char-misc-next base for fpga-testing
fpga-testing, all the in-flight patches that would apply with automatic merge conflict resolution
These are respectively
https://github.com/trixirt/linux-fpga/tree/fpga-next
https://github.com/trixirt/linux-fpga/tree/fpga-testing
There are two trivial changes, that could go to 5.12 now.
fpga: dfl: fme: Constify static attribute_group structs
fpga: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock
respectively
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20210108235414.48017-1-rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201228135135.28788-1-zhengyongjun3@huawei.com/
There are a couple of patchsets that conflict
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20210105230855.15019-7-russell.h.weight@intel.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201203171548.1538178-3-matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com/
Which I will follow up on.
And the xilinx patchset
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201217075046.28553-1-sonals@xilinx.com/
Which is being split/worked on offline.
If I have missed any patchset, poke me.
Tom
> > Tom > >
| |