lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree
From
Date
Hi,

On 9/8/20 1:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:22:06 +0200 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/8/20 6:00 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:
>>>
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
>>>
>>> between commit:
>>>
>>> f8bd54d21904 ("drm/i915: panel: Use atomic PWM API for devs with an external PWM controller")
>
> This should have been
>
> 899c537c25f9 ("drm/i915: Use 64-bit division macro")

Yes that makes more sense.

>>> from Linus' tree and commit:
>>>
>>> 6b51e7d23aa8 ("drm/i915: panel: Honor the VBT PWM frequency for devs with an external PWM controller")
>>
>> That doesn't sound correct, those are both commits from the drm-intel tree.
>>
>>> from the drm-intel tree.
>>>
>>> I fixed it up (I just used the latter)
>>
>> Just taking the drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c contents of:
>>
>> f8bd54d21904 ("drm/i915: panel: Use atomic PWM API for devs with an external PWM controller")
>>
>> Is the right thing to do, the problem is a difference in a line which gets
>> removed in that commit.
>
> Which is what I actually did, I guess :-)

Yes, looks good.

> Sorry about that.

No problem and thank you for all the work you do on -next.

Regards,

Hans

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-08 18:55    [W:0.043 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site