lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] kunit: ubsan integration
Hi Qian,

On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 08:38:25 -0400 Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 08:52:24AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 05:43:26PM +0000, Uriel Guajardo wrote:
> > > Integrates UBSAN into the KUnit testing framework. It fails KUnit tests
> > > whenever it reports undefined behavior.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardo@google.com>
> >
> > It looks like this patch had been merged into linux-next but the "[PATCH 1/2]
> > kunit: support failure from dynamic analysis tools" did not. Hence, it caused a
> > compiling failure.
> >
> > lib/ubsan.c: In function ‘ubsan_prologue’:
> > lib/ubsan.c:141:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kunit_fail_current_test’; did you mean ‘kunit_init_test’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > kunit_fail_current_test();
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > kunit_init_test
> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> Stephen, Shuah, can you revert this commit or pick up its dependency as well?

Sorry, for the slow response ... this should be gone today.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-09 05:01    [W:0.077 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site