lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Sep 2 (lib/ubsan.c)
From
Date
On 9/8/20 5:46 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:38:31 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/4/20 12:59 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:12 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 9/2/20 8:44 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>> On 9/2/20 1:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes since 20200828:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> on i386:
>>>>>
>>>>> ../lib/ubsan.c: In function ‘ubsan_prologue’:
>>>>> ../lib/ubsan.c:141:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kunit_fail_current_test’; did you mean ‘kunit_init_test’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>>> kunit_fail_current_test();
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Full randconfig file is attached.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Brendan,
>>>>
>>>> Do you know anything about this build error?
>>>>
>>>> I can't find kunit_fail_current_test() anywhere.
>>>
>>> Yeah, this got applied for some reason without the prerequisite
>>> patches. It is from a two patch series, the other being here:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200813205722.1384108-1-urielguajardojr@gmail.com/
>>>
>>> which in turn depends on another patchset which didn't make it into 5.9.
>>>
>>> Again, I don't know why this was applied without it's prereqs. Sorry about that.
>>>
>>
>> Well. Who is responsible for this small mess?
>> It is still killing linux-next builds for me (2020-0908).
>
> It came in via the kunit-next tree (Shuah cc'd). I will revert commit
> abe83f7621ee ("kunit: ubsan integration") today.


Thank you!

--
~Randy

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-09 02:50    [W:0.068 / U:0.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site