lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/7] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add cpufreq support for SM8250 SoC
On 0908, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 08 Sep 02:57 CDT 2020, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>
> > SM8250 SoC uses EPSS block for carrying out the cpufreq duties. Hence, add
> > support for it in the driver with relevant of_match data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > index de816bcafd33..c3c397cc3dc6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > @@ -285,8 +285,17 @@ static const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data qcom_soc_data = {
> > .lut_row_size = 32,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data sm8250_soc_data = {
>
> Could it be that this is the "epss_soc_data" (i.e. not sm8250 specific)?
> (We should still use/include the platform specific compatible though).
>

Hmm, makes sense. Will change it.

Thanks,
Mani

> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
> > + .reg_enable = 0x0,
> > + .reg_freq_lut = 0x100,
> > + .reg_volt_lut = 0x200,
> > + .reg_perf_state = 0x320,
> > + .lut_row_size = 4,
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct of_device_id qcom_cpufreq_hw_match[] = {
> > { .compatible = "qcom,cpufreq-hw", .data = &qcom_soc_data },
> > + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-epss", .data = &sm8250_soc_data },
> > {}
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_cpufreq_hw_match);
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-08 21:37    [W:0.044 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site