Messages in this thread | | | From | Dan Williams <> | Date | Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:49:42 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] Renovate memcpy_mcsafe with copy_mc_to_{user, kernel} |
| |
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:05 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:32:07PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > Given that Linus was the primary source of review feedback on these > > patches and a version of them have been soaking in -next with only a > > minor conflict report with vfs.git for the entirety of the v5.9-rc > > cycle (left there inadvertently while I was on leave), any concerns > > with me sending this to Linus directly during the merge window? > > What's wrong with them going through tip?
There's been a paucity of response on these after converging on the feedback from Linus. They missed v5.9, and I started casting about for what could be done to make sure they did not also miss v5.10 if the quiet continued. The preference is still "through tip".
> But before that pls have a look at this question I have here: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200929102512.GB21110@zn.tnic > > Thx.
Thanks, Boris, will do.
| |