lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/3] iommu/tegra-smmu: Rework .probe_device and .attach_dev
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 06:09:43PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> ...
> > static int tegra_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > struct device *dev)
> > {
> > + struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> > struct tegra_smmu *smmu = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> > struct tegra_smmu_as *as = to_smmu_as(domain);
> > - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > - struct of_phandle_args args;
> > unsigned int index = 0;
> > int err = 0;
> >
> > - while (!of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "iommus", "#iommu-cells", index,
> > - &args)) {
> > - unsigned int swgroup = args.args[0];
> > -
> > - if (args.np != smmu->dev->of_node) {
> > - of_node_put(args.np);
> > - continue;
> > - }
> > -
> > - of_node_put(args.np);
> > + if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &tegra_smmu_ops)
> > + return -ENOENT;
>
> In previous reply you said that these fwspec checks are borrowed from
> the arm-smmu driver, but I'm now looking at what other drivers do and I
> don't see them having this check.
>
> Hence I'm objecting the need to have this check here. You either should
> give a rational to having the check or it should be removed.
>
> Please never blindly copy foreign code, you should always double-check it.

I will give a test and remove it upon positive result.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-30 22:58    [W:0.161 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site