lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 02/10] rpmsg: core: Add channel creation internal API
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:09:52PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> From: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
>
> Add the channel creation API as a first step to be able to define the
> name service announcement as a rpmsg driver independent from the RPMsg
> virtio bus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
> ---
> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h | 12 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> index 91de940896e3..50a835eaf1ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,51 @@
>
> #include "rpmsg_internal.h"
>
> +/**
> + * rpmsg_create_channel() - create a new rpmsg channel
> + * using its name and address info.
> + * @rpdev: rpmsg driver

device

> + * @chinfo: channel_info to bind
> + *
> + * Returns a pointer to the new rpmsg device on success, or NULL on error.
> + */
> +struct rpmsg_device *
> + rpmsg_create_channel(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,

You might call this nitpicking, but we already have two indentation styles for
functions:

return_type function(type1 arg1,
...)

(my personal preference, it also has sub-variants - depending on the aligning
of the second line and any following lines, and one more moving "type1 arg1"
to the second line)

return_type
function(...

and now you're also introducing the third style - with "function" indented...
Maybe we don't need more of those, particularly since now with 100 chars per
line in most cases the very first style can be used.

> + struct rpmsg_channel_info *chinfo)
> +{
> + if (WARN_ON(!rpdev))
> + return NULL;
> + if (!rpdev->ops || !rpdev->ops->create_channel) {
> + dev_err(&rpdev->dev, "no create_channel ops found\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return rpdev->ops->create_channel(rpdev, chinfo);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_create_channel);
> +
> +/**
> + * rpmsg_release_channel() - release a rpmsg channel
> + * using its name and address info.
> + * @rpdev: rpmsg driver

device

> + * @chinfo: channel_info to bind
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success or an appropriate error value.
> + */
> +int rpmsg_release_channel(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> + struct rpmsg_channel_info *chinfo)
> +{
> + if (WARN_ON(!rpdev))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (!rpdev->ops || !rpdev->ops->release_channel) {
> + dev_err(&rpdev->dev, "no release_channel ops found\n");
> + return -EPERM;

ENOSYS or EOPNOTSUPP? I'm never sure which one is appropriate for
this kind of errors.

> + }
> +
> + return rpdev->ops->release_channel(rpdev, chinfo);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_release_channel);
> +
> /**
> * rpmsg_create_ept() - create a new rpmsg_endpoint
> * @rpdev: rpmsg channel device
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h
> index 3fc83cd50e98..587f723757d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
>
> /**
> * struct rpmsg_device_ops - indirection table for the rpmsg_device operations
> + * @create_channel: create backend-specific channel, optional
> + * @release_channel: release backend-specific channel, optional

Are they really optional? You return errors if they aren't available.

> * @create_ept: create backend-specific endpoint, required
> * @announce_create: announce presence of new channel, optional
> * @announce_destroy: announce destruction of channel, optional
> @@ -29,6 +31,11 @@
> * advertise new channels implicitly by creating the endpoints.
> */
> struct rpmsg_device_ops {
> + struct rpmsg_device *(*create_channel)(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> + struct rpmsg_channel_info *chinfo);
> + int (*release_channel)(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> + struct rpmsg_channel_info *chinfo);
> +
> struct rpmsg_endpoint *(*create_ept)(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> rpmsg_rx_cb_t cb, void *priv,
> struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo);
> @@ -75,6 +82,11 @@ int rpmsg_unregister_device(struct device *parent,
> struct device *rpmsg_find_device(struct device *parent,
> struct rpmsg_channel_info *chinfo);
>
> +struct rpmsg_device *
> +rpmsg_create_channel(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> + struct rpmsg_channel_info *chinfo);
> +int rpmsg_release_channel(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> + struct rpmsg_channel_info *chinfo);
> /**
> * rpmsg_chrdev_register_device() - register chrdev device based on rpdev
> * @rpdev: prepared rpdev to be used for creating endpoints
> --
> 2.25.1
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-30 08:36    [W:0.216 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site