[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu/tegra-smmu: Rework .probe_device and .attach_dev
30.09.2020 09:13, Nicolin Chen пишет:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 09:10:38AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 30.09.2020 08:49, Nicolin Chen пишет:
>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 08:11:52AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> 30.09.2020 03:30, Nicolin Chen пишет:
>>>>> + /* An invalid mc pointer means mc and smmu drivers are not ready */
>>>>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mc))
>>>> tegra_get_memory_controller() doesn't return NULL.
>>> Well, I don't want to assume that it'd do that forever, and the
>>> NULL check of IS_ERR_OR_NULL is marked "unlikely" so it doesn't
>>> hurt to have.
>> I don't see any reasons why it won't do that forever.
>> Secondly, public function can't be changed randomly without updating all
>> the callers.
>> Hence there is no need to handle cases that can't ever happen and it
>> hurts readability of the code + original error code is missed.
> I don't quite understand why an extra "_OR_NULL" would hurt
> readability....but I'd take a step back and use IS_ERR().

The tegra_get_memory_controller() doesn't return NULL, hence the
NULL-check is misleading.

If I was reading that code for the first time and notice such a thing,
then instantly I'd have a much lower credibility to the whole code.

 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-30 08:34    [W:0.046 / U:3.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site