lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC v7 1/6] dt-bindings: display: add Unisoc's drm master bindings
Hi!

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 02:27:35PM +0800, Kevin Tang wrote:
> From: Kevin Tang <kevin.tang@unisoc.com>
>
> The Unisoc DRM master device is a virtual device needed to list all
> DPU devices or other display interface nodes that comprise the
> graphics subsystem
>
> RFC v7:
> - Fix DTC unit name warnings
> - Fix the problem of maintainers
>
> Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>
> Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Tang <kevin.tang@unisoc.com>
> ---
> .../display/sprd/sprd,display-subsystem.yaml | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/sprd/sprd,display-subsystem.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/sprd/sprd,display-subsystem.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/sprd/sprd,display-subsystem.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9487a39
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/sprd/sprd,display-subsystem.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/sprd/sprd,display-subsystem.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Unisoc DRM master device
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Kevin Tang <kevin.tang@unisoc.com>
> +
> +description: |
> + The Unisoc DRM master device is a virtual device needed to list all
> + DPU devices or other display interface nodes that comprise the
> + graphics subsystem.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: sprd,display-subsystem
> +
> + ports:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> + description:
> + Should contain a list of phandles pointing to display interface port
> + of DPU devices.

Generally speaking, driver-specific properties should be prefixed by the
vendor name to avoid any conflict with generic properties (like the
OF-Graph ports subnode in this case)

Maxime
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-28 10:27    [W:0.068 / U:12.444 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site