lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/edp/jsl: Update vswing table for HBR and HBR2
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 04:07:39PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 08:15:29PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Sep 2020, "Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX" <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com> wrote:
> > > This is a good example of a potential trap that having
> > > IS_ELKHARTLAKE() cover both ELK and JSP creates. An unsuspecting coder
> > > might change the if ladder to have IS_ELKHARTLAKE() first, and the
> > > subsequent IS_JASPERLAKE() branch would never be taken.
> > >
> > > BR,
> > > Jani.
> > >
> > > Tejas : In that case I will put attention note in comment about
> > > platform checks such that ladder distrubance can be avoided. What you
> > > suggest?
>
> > The solution is to make IS_ELKHARTLAKE() mean ELK and only ELK.
>
> Since we are talking about the TLA for JSL in the other patch, for
> elkhartlake it is EHL, not ELK. ELK is something else, but I'm not sure
> what:
>
> $ git grep -w ELK -- drivers/gpu/drm/
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c: IS_GM45(i915) ? "CTG" : "ELK", reg_val);
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c: * Whether ILK really reuses the ELK register for this is unclear.
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: * Not 100% sure which way ELK should go here as the
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: * assume ELK doesn't need this.

Yeah, ELK = Eagle Lake, CTG = Cantiga. Both are old gen5 platforms IIRC.


Matt

>
> Lucas De Marchi
>
> >
> > BR,
> > Jani.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-29 01:14    [W:0.054 / U:0.632 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site