Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch RFC 00/15] mm/highmem: Provide a preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends | From | Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <> | Date | Thu, 24 Sep 2020 21:36:51 +0200 |
| |
On 9/24/20 10:27 AM, peterz@infradead.org wrote: > So my current todo list is: > > - Change RT PULL > - Change DL PULL > - Add migrate_disable() tracer; exactly like preempt/irqoff, except > measuring task-runtime instead of cpu-time. > - Add a mode that measures actual interference. > - Add a traceevent to detect preemption in migrate_disable(). > > > And then I suppose I should twist Daniel's arm to update his model to > include these scenarios and numbers.
Challenge accepted :-)
-- Daniel
| |