[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] PCI: brcmstb: fix a missing if statement on a return error check
On 22/09/2020 13:43, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 7:49 AM Markus Elfring <> wrote:
>>> The error return ret is not being check with an if statement and
>> Wording alternative:
>> The return value from a call of the function “brcm_phy_start” was not checked and
>>> V2: disable clock as noted by Florian Fainelli and suggested by
>>> Jim Quinlan.
>> Alex Dewar contributed another update suggestion.
>> [PATCH v2] PCI: brcmstb: Add missing if statement and error path
>> The exception handling needs further development considerations
>> for this function implementation.
> Hello,
> I agree with Alex's patch. I should have suggested this at the
> beginning but as our upstream STB suspend/resume is not yet functional
> and the one-line change would have worked until we fixed
> suspend/resume.. But this is the proper modification.

Yup, go with Alex's patch. That one is correct.

> Thanks,
> Jim
>> Regards,
>> Markus

 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-22 14:50    [W:0.024 / U:21.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site