lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 3/5] Asoc:qcom:lpass-cpu:Update dts property read API
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:22:38PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> On 22/09/2020 12:08, Mark Brown wrote:

> I agree with you on this and I see the point, but Rob had a very different
> opinion about the reg-names bindings to start with.

> This topic been discussed in the past with Rob in many instances ex: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/CAL_Jsq+MMunmVWqeW9v2RyzsMKP+=kMzeTHNMG4JDHM7Fy0HBg@mail.gmail.com/

> According to him, reg-names seems to be highly discouraged as it came along
> for the OMAP folks and was related to the hwmods stuff.

That's very much specific to reg, it's not true of the use of names in
general - Rob mentions cases like interrupts for example.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-22 13:46    [W:0.044 / U:0.584 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site