lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/13] bcache: inherit the optimal I/O size
Date
On 2020/9/21 22:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 05:54:59PM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
>> I am not sure whether virtual bcache device's optimal request size can
>> be simply set like this.
>>
>> Most of time inherit backing device's optimal request size is fine, but
>> there are two exceptions,
>> - Read request hits on cache device
>> - User sets sequential_cuttoff as 0, all writing may go into cache
>> device firstly.
>> For the above two conditions, all I/Os goes into cache device, using
>> optimal request size of backing device might be improper.
>>
>> Just a guess, is it OK to set the optimal request size of the virtual
>> bcache device as the least common multiple of cache device's and backing
>> device's optimal request sizes ?
>
> Well, if the optimal I/O size is wrong, the read ahead size also is
> wrong. Can we just drop the setting?
>

I feel this is something should be fixed. Indeed I overlooked it until
you point out the issue now.

The optimal request size and read ahead pages hint are necessary, but
current initialization is simple. A better way might be dynamically
setting them depends on the cache mode and some special configuration.

By your inspiration, I want to ACK your original patch although it
doesn't work fine for all condition. Then we may know these two settings
(ra_pages and queue_io_opt) should be improved for more situations. At
lease for most part of the situations they provide proper hints.

How do you think of the above idea ?

Coly Li

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-21 17:11    [W:0.054 / U:13.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site