lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65-wakeup: Use generic temperature-sensor for node name
On 11:55-20200902, Suman Anna wrote:
> On 9/1/20 5:30 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > Use temperature-sensor@ naming for nodes following standard conventions of device
> > tree (section 2.2.2 Generic Names recommendation in [1]).
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/tree/v0.3
> >
> > Suggested-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> > Suggested-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi
> > index bb498be2f0a4..ed42f13e7663 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi
> > @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
> > clock-names = "gpio";
> > };
> >
> > - wkup_vtm0: thermal@42050000 {
> > + wkup_vtm0: temperature-sensor@42050000 {
>
> There has been a suggestion to use something like thermal-sensor during the
> bindings review, but it is better to use this standard node name.

Yes - I did notice it as well, and then picked up the recommendation
straight from 0.3 spec itself.
>
> Reviewed-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>
> regards
> Suman
>
> > compatible = "ti,am654-vtm";
> > reg = <0x42050000 0x25c>;
> > power-domains = <&k3_pds 80 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> >
>

--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-02 20:15    [W:0.073 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site