lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] checkpatch: extend author Signed-off-by check for split From: header


On Sat, 19 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:

> On Sat, 2020-09-19 at 20:12 +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 19 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2020-09-19 at 13:42 +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote:
> > > > Checkpatch did not handle cases where the author From: header
> > > > was split into two lines. The author string went empty and
> > > > checkpatch generated a false NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF warning.
> > >
> > > It's good to provide an example where the current code
> > > doesn't work.
> > >
> >
> > Joe, as this is a linux-kernel-mentees patch, we discussed that before
> > reaching out to you; you can find Dwaipayan's own evaluation here:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/CABJPP5BOTG0QLFSaRJTb2vAZ_hJf229OAQihHKG4sYd35i_WMw@mail.gmail.com/
> >
> > Dwaipayan, Joe's comment is still valid; it would be good to describe
> > the reasons why patches might have split lines (as far as see, long
> > encodings for non-ascii names).
> >
> > I will run my own evaluation of checkpatch.pl before and after patch
> > application on Monday and then check if I can confirm Dwaipayan's results.
> >
> > > It likely would be better to do this by searching forward for
> > > any extension lines after a "^From:' rather than searching
> > > backwards as there can be any number of extension lines.
> > >
> >
> > Just to sure what you are talking about...
> >
> > You mean just to access the next line through the lines array, rather
> > than using prevheader and trying to decode that one line twice.
> >
> > I agree the logic is a bit redundant and complicated at the moment.
> >
> > Once prevheader is non-empty, it already clear that author is '' and
> > prevheader decodes with that match, because that is the only way to
> > make prevheader non-empty in the first place; at least as far I see it
> > right now.
>
> Yeah, something like this (completely untested):
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 3e474072aa90..2c710d05b184 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -2679,9 +2679,13 @@ sub process {
> }
>
> # Check the patch for a From:
> - if (decode("MIME-Header", $line) =~ /^From:\s*(.*)/) {
> + if ($line =~ /^From:\s*(.*)/i) {
> $author = $1;
> - $author = encode("utf8", $author) if ($line =~ /=\?utf-8\?/i);
> + my $curline = $linenr;
> + while (defined($rawlines[$curline] && $rawlines[$curline++] =~ /^ \s*(.*)/) {
> + $author .= $1;
> + }
> + $author = encode("utf8", $author) if ($author =~ /=\?utf-8\?/i);
> $author =~ s/"//g;
> $author = reformat_email($author);
> }
>

Yeah, I get how you would like to see that being implemented. I will work
with Dwaipayan to get that properly implemented, properly described and
tested.

But let us keep the fun of that task to Dwaipayan... that is what a
mentorship is all about :)

Lukas

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-19 20:38    [W:0.078 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site