Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Fri, 18 Sep 2020 18:13:47 +0200 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 7/8] x86/mce: Recover from poison found while copying from user space |
| |
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:55:18AM -0700, Tony Luck wrote: > From: Youquan Song <youquan.song@intel.com> > > Existing kernel code can only recover from a machine check on code that > tagged in the exception table with a fault handling recovery path.
"is tagged"
> New field in the task structure mce_vaddr is initialized to the > user virtual address of the fault. This is so that kill_me_maybe() > can provide that information to the user SIGBUS handler. > > Add code to recover from a machine check while copying data from user > space to the kernel. Action for this case is the same as if the user > touched the poison directly; unmap the page and send a SIGBUS to the task. > > Signed-off-by: Youquan Song <youquan.song@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/sched.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c > index 5512318a07ae..2a3c42329c3f 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c > @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ > #include <asm/mce.h> > #include <asm/msr.h> > #include <asm/reboot.h> > +#include <asm/insn.h> > +#include <asm/insn-eval.h> > > #include "internal.h" > > @@ -1197,6 +1199,32 @@ static void kill_me_maybe(struct callback_head *cb) > kill_me_now(cb); > } > > +/* > + * Decode a kernel instruction that faulted while reading from a user > + * address and return the linear address that was being read. > + */ > +static void __user *get_virtual_address(struct pt_regs *regs) > +{ > + u8 insn_buf[MAX_INSN_SIZE]; > + struct insn insn; > + > + if (copy_from_kernel_nofault(insn_buf, (void *)regs->ip, MAX_INSN_SIZE)) > + return (void __user *)~0ul;
You're initializing ->mce_vaddr to NULL below but you're returning ~0 here. You should return NULL here too. If it is NULL, this check from your next patch will pass:
if (p->mce_vaddr != (void __user *)~0ul) {
which would be the wrong thing to do so you need to think about a single invalid vaddr value and stick with it.
> + kernel_insn_init(&insn, insn_buf, MAX_INSN_SIZE); > + insn_get_length(&insn); > + insn_get_modrm(&insn); > + insn_get_sib(&insn);
AFAICT, you need the opcode only so why do all those?
I think you simply need to do:
insn_get_opcode()
and then check opcode->got because otherwise you might be looking at garbage below.
> + > + /* > + * For MOVS[BWLQ] the source address is in %rsi
Pls end your sentences with a fullstop.
> + */ > + if (insn.opcode.value == 0xa4 || insn.opcode.value == 0xa5) > + return (void __user *)regs->si;
How do you know just by looking at the opcodes, that the source operand in rSI is __user memory?
I see is_copy_from_user() in your next patch so I guess I'll verify that there...
> + else > + return insn_get_addr_ref(&insn, regs); > +} > + > /* > * The actual machine check handler. This only handles real > * exceptions when something got corrupted coming in through int 18. > @@ -1342,6 +1370,7 @@ noinstr void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs) > /* If this triggers there is no way to recover. Die hard. */ > BUG_ON(!on_thread_stack() || !user_mode(regs)); > > + current->mce_vaddr = NULL; > current->mce_addr = m.addr; > current->mce_ripv = !!(m.mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV); > current->mce_whole_page = whole_page(&m); > @@ -1350,6 +1379,13 @@ noinstr void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs) > current->mce_kill_me.func = kill_me_now; > task_work_add(current, ¤t->mce_kill_me, true); > } else { > + /* > + * Before fixing the exception IP, find the user address > + * in the MCE_IN_KERNEL_COPYIN case ^ |-- Fullstop
> + */ > + if (m.kflags & MCE_IN_KERNEL_COPYIN) > + current->mce_vaddr = get_virtual_address(regs); > + > /* > * Handle an MCE which has happened in kernel space but from > * which the kernel can recover: ex_has_fault_handler() has > @@ -1363,6 +1399,21 @@ noinstr void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs) > if (!fixup_exception(regs, X86_TRAP_MC, 0, 0)) > mce_panic("Failed kernel mode recovery", &m, msg); > } > + > + /* > + * MCE on user data while copying to kernel. Action here is > + * very similar to the user hitting the poison themself. > + * Poison page will be unmapped and signal sent to process. > + */ > + if (m.kflags & MCE_IN_KERNEL_COPYIN) { > + current->mce_addr = m.addr; > + current->mce_ripv = !!(m.mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV); > + current->mce_whole_page = whole_page(&m); > + current->mce_kill_me.func = kill_me_maybe; > + if (kill_it) > + current->mce_kill_me.func = kill_me_now; > + task_work_add(current, ¤t->mce_kill_me, true);
This hunk is mostly copied from the in-user case above. How about a "goto recover;" label instead of the duplication?
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
| |