Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5.8 000/177] 5.8.10-rc1 review | From | Shuah Khan <> | Date | Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:34:58 -0600 |
| |
On 9/16/20 11:25 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:34:52AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 9/16/20 9:26 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 08:26:48AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >>>> On 9/16/20 12:29 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:54:24PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >>>>>> On 9/15/20 3:06 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/15/20 8:11 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.10 release. >>>>>>>> There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>>>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>>>>>> let me know. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:06:12 +0000. >>>>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>>>>>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.8.10-rc1.gz >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> or in the git tree and branch at: >>>>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git >>>>>>>> linux-5.8.y >>>>>>>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> greg k-h >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Compiled and booted fine. wifi died: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: could not init core (-110) >>>>>>> ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: could not probe fw (-110) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is regression from 5.8.9 and 5.9-rc5 works just fine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I will try to bisect later this evening to see if I can isolate the >>>>>>> commit. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The following commit is what caused ath10k_pci driver problem >>>>>> that killed wifi. >>>>>> >>>>>> Prateek Sood <prsood@codeaurora.org> >>>>>> firmware_loader: fix memory leak for paged buffer >>>>>> >>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/commit/?h=linux-5.8.y&id=ec0a59266c9c9f46037efd3dcc0323973e102271 >>>>> >>>>> Ugh, that's not good, is this also a problem in 5.9-rc5 as well? For >>>>> reference, this is commit 4965b8cd1bc1 ("firmware_loader: fix memory >>>>> leak for paged buffer") in Linus's tree. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I am not seeing this on Linux 5.9-rc5 for sure. >>>> >>>>> And it should be showing up in 5.4.y at the moment too, as this patch is >>>>> in that tree right now... >>>>> >>>> >>>> I don't see this patch in 4.19.146-rc1 >>> >>> It's not there, it's in 5.4.66-rc1, which worked for you somehow, right? >>> >>>> Linus's tree works for with this patch in. I compared the two files >>>> for differences in commit between Linus's tree and 5.8.10-rc1 >>>> >>>> Couldn't find anything obvious. >>> >>> Again, really odd... >>> >>> I don't have a problem dropping it, but I should drop it from both 5.4.y >>> and 5.8.y, right? >>> >> >> Sorry. Yes. Dropping from 5.8 and 5.4 would be great until we figure out >> why this patch causes problems. >> >> I will continue debugging and let you know what I find. >
With this it boots and wifi is good for me. I am very puzzled by why this made a difference to make sure I am not narrowing in on the wrong patch.
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks, -- Shuah
| |