Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] Update CascadelakeX and SkylakeX events list | From | "Jin, Yao" <> | Date | Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:21:27 +0800 |
| |
Hi Arnaldo,
On 9/7/2020 4:01 PM, Jin, Yao wrote: > Hi Arnaldo, > > On 7/17/2020 2:06 PM, Jin, Yao wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 6/17/2020 3:38 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>> Em Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:27:40PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu: >>>> On 6/16/2020 2:16 PM, Ian Rogers wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:00 PM Jin, Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>>>>> Can I get an ACK for this patchset? >>>>>> On 6/3/2020 10:18 AM, Jin Yao wrote: >>>>>>> This patchset updates CascadelakeX events to v1.08 and >>>>>>> updates SkylakeX events to v1.21. >>> >>>>>>> The events have been tested on CascadelakeX and SkylakeX >>>>>>> servers with latest perf/core branch. >>> >>>>> could you rebase this on Arnaldo's tmp.perf/core tree? >>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=tmp.perf/core >>>>> I tried using git am but get: >>>>> Applying: perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08 >>>>> error: patch fragment without header at line 279: @@ -213,14 +220,14 @@ >>>>> error: could not build fake ancestor >>>>> Patch failed at 0001 perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ian >>>>> >>>> >>>> The patchset are applied OK on perf/core branch. >>>> >>>> As far as I understand, the patch for posting should be based on perf/core branch, is it right? >>> >>> Sorry, I've been testing with using tmp.perf/core as a way to more >>> quickly make available what I've processed, before I test it thoroughly >>> both with container builds and with manual testing, so the bleeding edge >>> is there, perf/core becoming a bit more stable, as I'll try not to >>> rebase it like before. >>> >>> - Arnaldo >>> >> >> Can this event update be accepted? >> >> Thanks >> Jin Yao > > Can this event list update be accepted? > > Thanks > Jin Yao
Ping again. :)
Can this event update patchset be accepted?
@Ian, I remembered you had tried this patchset and it's OK right?
Thanks Jin Yao
| |