lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/5] seqlock: Introduce PREEMPT_RT support
Hi all,

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:02:33 +0200 peterz@infradead.org wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:00:59AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 08:52:07AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 16:30 +0200, peterz@infradead.org wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:48:17PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > > > > > I think this happened because seqcount_##lockname##_init() is defined
> > > > > > at
> > > > > > function rather than macro, so when the seqcount_init() gets expand in
> > > > >
> > > > > Bah! I hate all this :/
> > > > >
> > > > > I suspect the below, while more verbose than I'd like is the best
> > > > > option.
> > > >
> > > > Stephen, can you add this patch for now until Peter beats you to it?
> > >
> > > Did you verify it works? I only wrote it..
> >
> > Yes, I did.
>
> Excellent, I'll stick a Tested-by from you on then.

I'll add this into the tip tree merge today (unless the tip tree is
updated in the mean time).

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-17 04:32    [W:0.506 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site