lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 5.8 067/177] NFC: st95hf: Fix memleak in st95hf_in_send_cmd
Date
From: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>

[ Upstream commit f97c04c316d8fea16dca449fdfbe101fbdfee6a2 ]

When down_killable() fails, skb_resp should be freed
just like when st95hf_spi_send() fails.

Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
index 9642971e89cea..4578547659839 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
@@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ static int st95hf_in_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
rc = down_killable(&stcontext->exchange_lock);
if (rc) {
WARN(1, "Semaphore is not found up in st95hf_in_send_cmd\n");
- return rc;
+ goto free_skb_resp;
}

rc = st95hf_spi_send(&stcontext->spicontext, skb->data,
--
2.25.1


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-16 01:35    [W:0.464 / U:15.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site