lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v8 1/5] PCI: Conditionally initialize host bridge native_* members
From
Date


On 9/10/20 2:00 PM, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>
>
> On 9/10/20 12:49 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 08:58:52PM -0700, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com wrote:
>>> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> If CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS is not enabled in kernel then initialing
>>> struct pci_host_bridge PCIe specific native_* members to "1" is
>>> incorrect. So protect the PCIe specific member initialization
>>> with CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS.
>>
>> s/initialing/initializing/
> will fix it in next version.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/pci/probe.c | 4 +++-
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>>> index 2f66988cea25..a94b97564ceb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>>> @@ -588,12 +588,14 @@ static void pci_init_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
>>>        * may implement its own AER handling and use _OSC to prevent the
>>>        * OS from interfering.
>>>        */
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS
>>>       bridge->native_aer = 1;
>>>       bridge->native_pcie_hotplug = 1;
>>> -    bridge->native_shpc_hotplug = 1;
>>>       bridge->native_pme = 1;
>>>       bridge->native_ltr = 1;
>>
>> native_ltr isn't dependent on PCIEPORTBUS either, is it?  It's only
>> used for ASPM.
> Agreed. I was confused due to a comment in include/linux/pci.h
>
>  unsigned int    native_ltr:1;           /* OS may use PCIe LTR */
Currently there is no code dependency between LTR and CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS.

But I am wondering whether its correct to move LTR code under
CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS?. As per PCIe spec v5.0 sec 7.8.2, LTR is a optional
PCIe extended capability. So why is not moved under drivers/pci/pcie/*. What is
the criteria for code to be placed under drivers/pci/pcie/*
>
>>
>>>       bridge->native_dpc = 1;
>>> +#endif
>>> +    bridge->native_shpc_hotplug = 1;
>>>       device_initialize(&bridge->dev);
>>>   }
>>> --
>>> 2.17.1
>>>
>

--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-09-13 22:50    [W:0.089 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site