lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq statistics retrieved by drivers
    On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 10:33:02AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
    >
    >
    > On 8/5/2020 9:03 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
    > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 06:34:36PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
    > >> On 05-08-20, 12:04, Lukasz Luba wrote:
    > >>> I know that Viresh is going to develop patches and improve these
    > >>> cpufreq stats framework. Maybe he also had this 'aggregation' in mind.
    > >>> I will leave it him.
    > >>
    > >> I am only going to look at cpufreq's view of stats independently from
    > >> the firmware.
    > >>
    > >
    > > +1, I agree with that. Kernel must avoid any logic to aggregate or
    > > interpret the data in a generic way. The userspace tools can manage that
    > > especially if this tend to be platform specific.
    >
    > We can probably standardize on how to expose the firmware maintained
    > statistics such that these tools do not have to widely vary from
    > platform to platform, right?

    Ofcourse. I just don't want any logic that interpret/analyse the stats
    comparing with the in-kernel stats or otherwise.

    --
    Regards,
    Sudeep

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2020-08-06 19:40    [W:2.439 / U:0.704 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site