lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch V2 24/46] PCI: vmd: Mark VMD irqdomain with DOMAIN_BUS_VMD_MSI
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:16:52PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>
> Devices on the VMD bus use their own MSI irq domain, but it is not
> distinguishable from regular PCI/MSI irq domains. This is required
> to exclude VMD devices from getting the irq domain pointer set by
> interrupt remapping.
>
> Override the default bus token.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> @@ -579,6 +579,12 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Override the irq domain bus token so the domain can be distinguished
> + * from a regular PCI/MSI domain.
> + */
> + irq_domain_update_bus_token(vmd->irq_domain, DOMAIN_BUS_VMD_MSI);
> +

Having the non-transparent-bridge hold a MSI table and
multiplex/de-multiplex IRQs looks like another good use case for
something close to pci_subdevice_msi_create_irq_domain()?

If each device could have its own internal MSI-X table programmed
properly things would work alot better. Disable capture/remap of the
MSI range in the NTB.

Then each device could have a proper non-multiplexed interrupt
delivered to the CPU.. Affinity would work properly, no need to share
IRQs (eg vmd_irq() goes away)/etc.

Something for the VMD maintainers to think about at least.

As I hear more about NTB these days a full MSI scheme for NTB seems
interesting to have in the PCI-E core code..

Jason

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-31 16:40    [W:0.646 / U:2.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site