Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: CPPC: simply the code access 'highest_perf' value in cppc_perf_caps struct | From | Xin Hao <> | Date | Tue, 4 Aug 2020 10:37:47 +0800 |
| |
Hi everyone:
I want to know why my patch didn't merge into upstream ?
Thanks
在 2020/7/1 下午12:20, Xin Hao 写道: > The 'caps' variable has been defined, so there is no need to get > 'highest_perf' value through 'cpu->caps.highest_perf', you can use > 'caps->highest_perf' instead. > > Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c > index 257d726a4456..051d0e56c67a 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c > @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu, > if (!max_khz) > max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz(); > mul = max_khz; > - div = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf; > + div = caps->highest_perf; > } > return (u64)perf * mul / div; > } > @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu, > } else { > if (!max_khz) > max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz(); > - mul = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf; > + mul = caps->highest_perf; > div = max_khz; > } >
| |