lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: No need to verify cpufreq_driver in show_scaling_cur_freq()
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 7:24 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> "cpufreq_driver" is guaranteed to be valid here, no need to check it
> here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 02ab56b2a0d8..47aa90f9a7c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -703,8 +703,7 @@ static ssize_t show_scaling_cur_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
> freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(policy->cpu);
> if (freq)
> ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", freq);
> - else if (cpufreq_driver && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy &&
> - cpufreq_driver->get)
> + else if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy && cpufreq_driver->get)
> ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu));
> else
> ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", policy->cur);
> --

This and the [2/2] applied, the latter with some minor edits in the
subject/changelog.

Thanks!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-27 14:28    [W:0.151 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site