Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Date | Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:54:53 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: No need to verify cpufreq_driver in show_scaling_cur_freq() |
| |
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 7:24 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > > "cpufreq_driver" is guaranteed to be valid here, no need to check it > here. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > index 02ab56b2a0d8..47aa90f9a7c2 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -703,8 +703,7 @@ static ssize_t show_scaling_cur_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf) > freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(policy->cpu); > if (freq) > ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", freq); > - else if (cpufreq_driver && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy && > - cpufreq_driver->get) > + else if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy && cpufreq_driver->get) > ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu)); > else > ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", policy->cur); > --
This and the [2/2] applied, the latter with some minor edits in the subject/changelog.
Thanks!
| |