Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:36:03 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Add ACPI support |
| |
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 09:30:44PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 06:02:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That's not something that it's particularly idiomatic to actually use in > > ACPI and you end up with the same namespacing problem assigning IDs so > > I'm not sure it makes life any better.
> So what's the idiomatic thing to do in this case, allocate the first > free PNP ID now for DSPI controller on LS2085A, then another one for > DSPI on LX2160A later, etc etc?
AFAICT yes, assuming you don't make it look like a PCI device and enumerate that way which is more how these things more normally end up getting done. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |