lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] dynamic debug: allow printing to trace event
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 07:15:31PM +0200, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:31:51 +0200
> Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> wrote:
> > index aa9ff9e1c0b3..f599ed21ecc5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dynamic_debug.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dynamic_debug.h
> > @@ -27,13 +27,16 @@ struct _ddebug {
> > * writes commands to <debugfs>/dynamic_debug/control
> > */
> > #define _DPRINTK_FLAGS_NONE 0
> > -#define _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT (1<<0) /* printk() a message using the format */
> > +#define _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINTK (1<<0) /* printk() a message using the format */
>
> The above looks like a cleanup unrelated to this patch, and probably
> should be on its own.

I've moved this and the other renaming hunk out to a separate patch.

> > #define _DPRINTK_FLAGS_INCL_MODNAME (1<<1)
> > #define _DPRINTK_FLAGS_INCL_FUNCNAME (1<<2)
> > #define _DPRINTK_FLAGS_INCL_LINENO (1<<3)
> > #define _DPRINTK_FLAGS_INCL_TID (1<<4)
> > +#define _DPRINTK_FLAGS_TRACE (1<<5)
> > +#define _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT (_DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINTK | \
> > + _DPRINTK_FLAGS_TRACE)
> > #if defined DEBUG
> > -#define _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT
> > +#define _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINTK
> > #else
> > #define _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT 0
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/printk.h b/include/trace/events/printk.h
> > index 13d405b2fd8b..6c89121a1669 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/events/printk.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/printk.h
> > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> >
> > -TRACE_EVENT(console,
> > +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(printk,
> > TP_PROTO(const char *text, size_t len),
> >
> > TP_ARGS(text, len),
> > @@ -31,6 +31,16 @@ TRACE_EVENT(console,
> >
> > TP_printk("%s", __get_str(msg))
> > );
> > +
> > +DEFINE_EVENT(printk, console,
> > + TP_PROTO(const char *text, size_t len),
> > + TP_ARGS(text, len)
> > +);
> > +
> > +DEFINE_EVENT(printk, dynamic,
>
> Can we call this "dynamic_printk" or "printk_dynamic", as
> trace_dynamic() is too generic.

I went for "dyndbg" (printk:dyndbg / trace_dyndbg()) which is the
documented name of the infrastructure.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-25 17:41    [W:0.591 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site