lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2][next] update gdb scripts for lockless printk ringbuffer
From
Date
Hi Petr,

On 21/08/2020 09:55, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 21.08.20 10:08, Petr Mladek wrote:
>> On Fri 2020-08-14 23:31:23, John Ogness wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> When we brought in the new lockless printk ringbuffer, we overlooked the gdb
>>> scripts. Here are a set of patches to implement gdb support for the new
>>> ringbuffer.
>>>
>>> John Ogness (2):
>>> scripts/gdb: add utils.read_ulong()
>>> scripts/gdb: update for lockless printk ringbuffer
>>
>> I am not fluent in the gdb macros and python so I did not try any
>> deep review. But both patches work for me:
>>
>> Tested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
>>
>> I am going to give it few more days before pushing just in case there is
>> another feedback.

Before 'pushing' ?

What context do you mean here? These patches go through AKPM don't they?
Did I miss some update to procedures?

>>
>
> Thanks, perfect!
>
>> Best Regards,
>> Petr
>>
>> BTW: Are you aware of https://github.com/crash-python/crash-python project?
>> The ambition is to implement "crash" features and even more into
>> gdb using python extensions. It similar approach like
>> scripts/gdb/
>>
>> crash-python is being developed sporadically in waves. It is
>> mostly during a week that is dedicated for such projects
>> at SUSE. It would be great to get more contributors.
>>
>
> The problem with all those out-of-tree kernel debugging projects is that
> they are even further away from the changes in upstream they need to
> adjust to over and over again. It's already hard for scripts/gdb to keep
> up as only few people are aware of the dependencies, and it's always
> easy to forget. But it's getting better and better here IMHO. And that
> was my idea behind pushing things into upstream.

Seconding that, and having also investigated the crash projects in
previous work. I really wish there was more alignment to the kernel ;-)

/me ponders what happened to the kernel awareness integrations on GDB...
I know others have been investigating too, If only I had time ...

> Jan
>


--
--
Kieran

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-24 11:22    [W:0.074 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site